WHO’s REALLY LYING?
The Left claims that Bush lied about WMD’s in Iraq, even though;(1) it was Clinton who first brought up the WMD issue, and
(2) WMD’s HAVE BEEN FOUND in Iraq!!!
WMD Found in Iraq to date:
· 1.77 metric tons of enriched uranium.
· 1,500 gallons of chemical weapons agents.
· 17 chemical warheads containing cyclosarin (a nerve agent 5 times more deadly than sarin).
· Over 1,000 radioactive materials in powdered form meant for dispersal over populated areas.
· Roadside bombs loaded with mustard and "conventional" sarin gas, assembled in binary chemical projectiles for maximum potency.
This is just a PARTIAL LIST of the WMD verified to have been recovered in Iraq so far.
Yet Americans overwhelmingly believe THE LIE that U.S. and coalition forces have found NO weapons of mass destruction. WHY????
The answer is simple. Leftists in government and in the Media have been waging a propaganda war for their own political purposes. They aren’t interested in the truth, they’re not even really interested in PEACE, all they want is to destroy The President and weaken America.
JOE WILSON LIED ABOUT HIS NIGERIA REPORT. PRESIDENT BUSH TOLD THE TRUTH!
BUT WE CAN’T EXPECT PEOPLE WHO WORSHIPPED THE CLINTONS TO KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT THE TRUTH! CAN WE?
- Matt
WMD info can be found in the book: Disinformation: 22 Media Myths That Undermine the War on Terror, by Richard Miniter
posted by Matt's Commentary @ 11:26 AM
6 comments
6 Comments:
WOW! You really believe everything your write?? I sure don't worship the clintons and sure as hell don't believe in mr. bush. But of course I can't rely on you to be objective after reading your blog! mr. bush is not smart enough to even lie to the American people, he has cheney and the other folks in the white house to do it for him. If he were left to think for himself he would not be able to complete a sentence. Just read or listen to some of his many many comments he has made without a speech writer and you, yes even you will see his level of intelligence or lack thereof.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
The Washington Post reported: "...Wilson's report, rather than debunking intelligence about purported uranium sales to Iraq, as he has said, bolstered the case... And, contrary to Wilson's assertions,...the CIA did not tell the White House it had qualms about the reliability of the Africa intelligence..." (Wash. Post, July 10, 2004)
-Matt
P.S. Profanity is a sign of limited intelligence.
I love how these liberals resort to either the "Bush is Stupid" fable, or foul language and insults to make - what point? Who knows?
You should leave their stupid comments up so the world can see their idiocy.
You may want to check this out with regard to your claim re: 1.7 tons of Uranium.
http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/iraq/tuwaitha.htm
Quote: "Following the 1991 Gulf War, the International Atomic Energy Agency removed all known Iraqi stocks of highly enriched uranium and plutonium, in accordance with the provisions of UN Security Council Resolution 687. As of 2002 the only positively confirmed nuclear material left in Iraq is 1.8 tons of low-enriched uranium and several tons of natural and depleted uranium. The material is in a locked storage site at the Tuwaitha nuclear research facility near Baghdad. Under the terms of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, this stock of material is checked once a year by an IAEA team. The most recent check was in January 2002, and none of the material had been tampered with at that time."
Thanks Tyrone. I've been directed to that before. This does not refute the claim I cited (not my claim). Global Security .ORG cannot be considered a reliable source anyway. 17 U.N. Resolution violations, Saddam's own WMD claims, with verified WMD's produced, and later unaccounted for, etc. etc. ad nauseum, all indicate that Saddam Hussein was an obvious international threat on several levels, including WMD.
But none of this has to to with the point that anti-war types are never going to allow themselves to give Bush the benefit of the doubt. They can't say he was merely wrong, because that undermines their political goals, so it has to be "Bush Lied", and when conservatives point out quotes from Liberals that show their own hypocrisy and lying, i.e. Joe Wilson's mutiple fabrications, they ignore it, and turn the debate back to "Bush lied us into war"... Which is bogus on its face for many reasons, but especially because the WMD issue was not the only reason for going to war.
People can disagree on the policy on many legitimate grounds, but the the "Bush lied" claim, nor the idea tha Hussein was not a WMD threat, qualify.
But, thanks for your info.
Post a Comment
<< Home